Hospitals must end caesarean stigma, after maternity review

After the devastating Ockenden maternity review, NHS hospitals have been told to listen to women and their families, to ensure women’s voices are heard

In 2018, two families who lost their baby daughters after receiving care from the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, asked for a review of the maternity services. That review, one of the biggest in the history of the NHS, has finished today and has concluded that over 200 babies may have died - and others left with life-changing injuries - due to hospital failures. 

In some cases where babies were left with brain injuries, this was attributed to the hospital's aversion to providing caesarian sections. 

Senior midwife Donna Ockenden, who led the review into maternity failings at Shropshire hospitals hopes that the findings will be “A blueprint for safe care”. 


Hospitals have failed at providing top maternity healthcare 

According to Ockenden "failures in care were repeated from one incident to the next", in maternity care at the Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust.

It was revealed that:

  • 201 babies could have survived if the hospital had provided better care
  • 29 babies suffered severe brain injuries, which could have been avoided
  • 65 babies were left with cerebral palsy, due to the poor quality of maternity care
  • It was discovered that some mothers were also blamed for the deaths of their babies


SaTH has accepted full responsibility for its failures.

In March 2009, baby Kate died a few hours after her birth. Her parents Richard Stanton and Rhiannon Davies wanted answers as to why. 

Later in 2016, baby Pippa died from a Group B Streptococcus infection, leaving her parents Kayleigh and Colin Griffiths devastated and also demanding answers. Together, the bereaved parents pushed for a review. 

"Our families have consistently said they want two things - to understand what happened to them and why - then to ensure what happened to them makes a difference to the safety of maternity services - locally and across England. We promised we would help in that change," they said.

Youtube Placeholder

Placing a woman’s choice at the heart of hospital healthcare

Josie Robinson, a specialist in Clinical Negligence at Lime Solicitors, hopes that this time, mothers and families will be placed at the centre of the maternity processes, instead of being treated as a box ticking exercise.

“The issues raised in today’s report are not new and have been discussed time and again without any real attention being given to the systemic issues causing this gap in care,” said Robinson. “As clinical negligence lawyers we have witnessed failings in obstetric care for many years, with a lack of kindness and compassion and a culture of cover up. Countless clients have had their lives shattered by grief and loss due to negligent care and we have finally hit a pivotal moment for fundamental change and reform. I urge those in power to drive real change following this review, to give the brave families involved the legacy they deserve and ensure this is not another inquiry that fails to receive the attention it deserves.”

Victoria Gofton, also of Lime Solicitors, echoed her colleagues' comments on the Ockenden maternity review.

“It is promising to see that one of the recommendations made in this report is to listen to women and their families and to ensure women’s voices are truly heard. It was hugely disappointing to read how many women felt they were not treated with compassion and kindness during what for many was a devastating time of their life, and I am hopeful that the families will be reassured these shortcomings will not happen to others going forward.

“We have seen claims that lessons will be learned in the past and I encourage the NHS to take this opportunity to keep to their word and implement the necessary changes for good this time. One crucial area for these promises to be kept is regarding women making informed choices about their care and being provided with accurate information to enable this, not least about mode of delivery. Too many hospitals are reluctant to go ahead with caesarean sections and this stigma must end, placing the woman’s choice at the heart of decision making over any wider hospital policy issues.”

Share

Featured Articles

Healthcare business roundup: Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Aspen

Eli Lilly's experimental cardiovascular drug ‘promising’; Aspen Pharmacare to manufacture mpox vaccines; Novo Nordisk says Ozempic shortage ‘worsening’

Global Health Funding 'Facing Post-Pandemic Challenges'

IHME report highlights shifting priorities and economic pressures affecting global health financing, despite increase in funding since pre-COVID levels

The Merck Group: Pharma's History & Innovation in India

Welcome back to part two of our exploration of The Merck Group's history and investment in China and India, with this part focusing on innovation in India

How CVS Health is Rising to the Omnichannel Challenge

Procurement & Supply Chain

Kinaxis: Pharma Seeing Euro-wide Supply Chain Challenges

Procurement & Supply Chain

Healthcare Digital Transformations Stymied by Data Silos

Digital Healthcare